Ovum Act 5 Option A Late Urnfield to Hallstatt Culture. Devin Gate, Europe 800 BCE

Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

The Homelands of H6a1a8?

Credit: ©  Although OpenStreetMap Contributors.

These blog posts do not claim to be factual beyond the available written records. Based on the fragments I can glean from Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA variants—supplemented by evidence from ancient DNA and archaeology—I weave a narrative. To a scientist, this leap of faith might seem heretical. But I am no scientist; I am a Time Traveller, and I claim the storyteller’s right to narrative.

I ask your forgiveness as I spin these stories through a web of ancient cultures. I cannot prove that a specific ancestor belonged to any particular archaeological horizon; I can only suggest what might have been. It is a matter of plausibility, not certainty.

In that spirit, I suggest that the map above—spanning the Alps, the Carpathians, and their surrounding regions—might just be the cradle where H6a1a mutated to become H6a1a8. It is plausible that this was the homeland of my later F8693412 private variant, shared today by an Austrian tester and several English H6a1a8 descendants.

Now, I shall zoom into the Vienna and Danube Basin, focusing on that narrow gap where the river passes near modern-day Bratislava: The Devín Gate.

In 800 BCE, the Danube here was a labyrinth of shifting gravel banks and braided waterways, choked with deadwood. Dense, riparian wild forests of willow and poplar lined the alluvial plains. Bison, aurochs, wolves, brown bears and red deer still frequented the shallows.

Human presence and their mixed agriculture were defined by the archaeological culture known as Urnfield, which was then transitioning into the Hallstatt culture; the local inhabitants likely left traces of both. To the east of the Devín Gate lay the downstream expanse of the Little Hungarian Plain—the Danubian Flat—where vast, wild wetlands dominated the landscape. 

The success of local cultures did not lie entirely with their agriculture. It also lay in their position within Europe—a position that was particularly valuable now, as the first iron smiths arrived to bring the Late Bronze Age to a close. Trade routes brought precious amber down from the Baltic through the Morava River valley; Europe was not some neat division of peoples, isolated from one another. Meanwhile, salt moved north from the Hallstatt salt mines in the Alps. Locals would control these movements and barter for luxuries: textiles, bronze, tin, and wine from the south.

It was this movement of people along established trade networks that could have been responsible for carrying the mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H6a1a8 (including but not only the F8693412 private variant cluster) towards its modern distribution in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Finland, and Sweden (note* ftDNA maps). Central to that distribution is my proposed homeland. Trade routes across different ages may have helped to carry H6a1a8 through various successive cultures; I perceive mtDNA haplogroup H6a1a8 to be intrinsically connected to the European Iron Age.

This movement of peoples across the Continent and even into the British & Irish Isles, offers one explanation of the distribution of a haplogroup, that Family Tree DNA currently dates to a TMRCA (Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor) of 761 BCE - representing a range of between 1230 BCE and 328 BCE.

Although the people who lived here at this time were to be increasingly identified as belonging to Hallstatt Culture, their Urnfield practices continued.  Almost all of their dead were cremated, cheating modern geneticists of their ancient DNA. The ashes of their loved ones were then placed in distinctive urns, which would be buried in vast urn fields, devoid of mounds.

Their settlements were often small, open villages located on fertile river terraces. Within timber-framed longhouses and pit-houses, walled with wattle and daub, they lived under roofs of thatched reed harvested from the wetlands. There is archaeological evidence that the walls of the houses may have been decorated with red or geometric patterns (triangles or spirals).

However, people were just beginning to move back up onto the Devín and Braunsberg heights for protection as social tensions rose. Society was becoming "heroic" in the Homeric sense; power was held by local "big men" who proved their worth through feasting and gift-giving. Into this mix, the new technology of iron was arriving.

Interestingly, ancient DNA studies from the broader Iron Age suggest that many of these communities practiced matrilocality or maintained strong maternal clan structures. The women here may have been the permanent heart of the community, while men moved between tribes to forge alliances.

There were also larger hillforts, such as those crowning the heights of the Devín Gate. These forts featured box ramparts that would have appeared as massive white or grey stone walls from a distance. Here, the chieftains and elites resided.

These people loved colour. They used natural dyes such as woad (blue), madder (red), and weld (yellow), and plaid-like patterns (checked weaving) were already in use. Jewellery was bold—heavy bronze neck-rings (torcs) and "spectacle" fibulae (large brooch-pins made of coiled wire).

Perhaps, my one hundred-times great-grandmother was here? Maybe that is her weaving above? My mtDNA H6a1a8 ancestor.

GO TO NEXT ACT OPTION A - Early Jastorf culture, The Elbe, Altmark, North German plain. 500 BCE


Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

FT-DNA Family Finder My Origins 2.0 - April 2017 update

If there is anyone out there reading this blog, you know my recorded ancestry - all SE English, mainly East Anglian. No recorded evidence of anything but English over the past two or three centuries. This is not to say that I don't think any actually happened.




51% British might seem low for an Englishman - but I'm aware that my personal DNA flavour is a bit atypical for a Brit, more Continental. My Origins 1.0 gave me 36% British. 23andMe un-phased gives me 32% British / Irish. I do however suspect that my flavour isn't so atypical for an East Anglian of local rural ancestry. Living DNA gave me the most, a whopping 74% British. Therefore on that score, you could say that for myself, My Origins 2.0 actually comes in at 2nd place - better than 23andMe, DNA.land, or WeGene. I'm currently waiting for Ancestry.com results, but I'm not expecting better.

46% West and Central European where I have no record of any such ancestry - but East Anglian has been noted as close to North German, and certainly, SE England has plenty of early medieval admixture from that part of the world during the Anglo-Saxon event. In addition, we've continued to have immigration from the Continent over the past several hundred years, particularly but not exclusively, from the Netherlands and Northern France. I recently noticed that a 5xgreat grandparent had the surname Moll that is often found in Germany. However, it is also found in East Anglia, but are they connected? One day I'll find a recorded non-English ancestor! So as an East Anglian, I forgive autosomal DNA for ancestry algorythms that suggest that I have Dutch, German, French, or Danish ancestry. 23andMe (un-phased) gave me 27% French & German". Even Living DNA gave me 4.6% Scandinavian and 2% Germanic.

Now the Traces. I find these really interesting. Because they could fit in with other evidence. The My Origins 2.0 "Southeast European" designation appears to include Italy. My Origins 1.0 gave me a very silly 32% Southern European. 23andMe gave me 2% Southern European (although I have noted that the majority of English testers get a small percentage of this). Living DNA gave me a whopping 9.6% Tuscany. A friendly discussion with one of the LDNA techs, suggested that it looked to them, to be genuine. There was a family story on my father's side, that there was a "foreigner" - but I've never found any recorded evidence. I've scanned and scanned the tree for any sign, but nada. Not in great gp to 3 x great gp range. I'm open to a possible NPE, but I need more evidence than one auDNA test result.

The trace West Middle East and Ashkenazi are interesting, because although I have no recorded West Middle East or Ashkenazi ancestry, my Y-DNA does originate in SW Asia, possibly the area of Iran or Iraq. However, no auDNA test or GEDmatch calculator so far has provided any surviving evidence in the autosomes of any Asian, above that of average for a Brit. It all appeared washed out by genetic recombination. I share my Y with another family (different surname) from England, and we trace our lines back to the 1740's in Southern England (32 miles apart). That to me suggests that our immigrant Y ancestor most likely arrived in Southern England at least 400-500 years ago. I suspect earlier, maybe Medieval or even Roman. However, has the new algorithm picked something up? Maybe just a coincidence. The nearest non-English STR tester to us hailed from South Khorasan, Iran

A better prediction for myself than the My Origins 1.0 (below).

FT-DNA My Ancient Origins

Family Tree DNA (FTDNA) have released a new, unexpected feature to their autosomal DNA Family Finder package.  It is clearly aimed at their customers (both new and existing), of mainly European heritage.  It uses ancient DNA references to plot our ancient ancestry.  It breaks European's ancient Eurasian ancestry down into four groups:

  • Hunter-Gatherer (Western Hunter-Gatherer)
  • Farmer (Early Neolithic Farmer)
  • Metal Age Invader (Yamnaya / Bronze Age Steppe immigration)
  • Non European (Other)

First of all, I welcome this new analysis.  Combined with the latest cutting edge research into the origin of the Eurasians, and with other open source calculators of ancient origin available via GedMatch - I feel that it can help us get personal with our ancient Eurasian roots.

However... unfortunately it has faults, as the online community quickly picked up.  In particular, with the Metal Age Invader component.  FT-DNA suggests that it represents the Yamnaya admixture event - where Copper or Early Bronze Age pasturalists, mounted on their horses, expanded from the Pontic and Caspian Steppes of Eurasia, into Europe around 5,000 years ago.  But 1) it doesn't include any ANE (Ancient North Eurasian) component from the Mal'ta-Buret reference, and 2) it of course cannot distinguish it's Western Hunter-Gatherer reference from that inherited directly within Europe or elsewhere.

All that the FT-DNA Metal Age Invader reference appears to represent, is the population known as Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer.  A minority component of Yamnaya DNA as we currently see it.

For the record, as the screendump above shows, my FT-DNA Ancient Origins are:

9% Metal Age Invader

47% Farmer

44% Hunter-Gatherer

0% Non European

Now that I've got that covered, I can move onto my next blog post, which I find more interesting - how I use My Ancient Origins to try to reconstruct my ancestry from 11,000 to 4,000 years ago.