Ovum Act 5 Option A Late Urnfield to Hallstatt Culture. Devin Gate, Europe 800 BCE

Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

The Homelands of H6a1a8?

Credit: ©  Although OpenStreetMap Contributors.

These blog posts do not claim to be factual beyond the available written records. Based on the fragments I can glean from Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA variants—supplemented by evidence from ancient DNA and archaeology—I weave a narrative. To a scientist, this leap of faith might seem heretical. But I am no scientist; I am a Time Traveller, and I claim the storyteller’s right to narrative.

I ask your forgiveness as I spin these stories through a web of ancient cultures. I cannot prove that a specific ancestor belonged to any particular archaeological horizon; I can only suggest what might have been. It is a matter of plausibility, not certainty.

In that spirit, I suggest that the map above—spanning the Alps, the Carpathians, and their surrounding regions—might just be the cradle where H6a1a mutated to become H6a1a8. It is plausible that this was the homeland of my later F8693412 private variant, shared today by an Austrian tester and several English H6a1a8 descendants.

Now, I shall zoom into the Vienna and Danube Basin, focusing on that narrow gap where the river passes near modern-day Bratislava: The Devín Gate.

In 800 BCE, the Danube here was a labyrinth of shifting gravel banks and braided waterways, choked with deadwood. Dense, riparian wild forests of willow and poplar lined the alluvial plains. Bison, aurochs, wolves, brown bears and red deer still frequented the shallows.

Human presence and their mixed agriculture were defined by the archaeological culture known as Urnfield, which was then transitioning into the Hallstatt culture; the local inhabitants likely left traces of both. To the east of the Devín Gate lay the downstream expanse of the Little Hungarian Plain—the Danubian Flat—where vast, wild wetlands dominated the landscape. 

The success of local cultures did not lie entirely with their agriculture. It also lay in their position within Europe—a position that was particularly valuable now, as the first iron smiths arrived to bring the Late Bronze Age to a close. Trade routes brought precious amber down from the Baltic through the Morava River valley; Europe was not some neat division of peoples, isolated from one another. Meanwhile, salt moved north from the Hallstatt salt mines in the Alps. Locals would control these movements and barter for luxuries: textiles, bronze, tin, and wine from the south.

It was this movement of people along established trade networks that could have been responsible for carrying the mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H6a1a8 (including but not only the F8693412 private variant cluster) towards its modern distribution in England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Finland, and Sweden (note* ftDNA maps). Central to that distribution is my proposed homeland. Trade routes across different ages may have helped to carry H6a1a8 through various successive cultures; I perceive mtDNA haplogroup H6a1a8 to be intrinsically connected to the European Iron Age.

This movement of peoples across the Continent and even into the British & Irish Isles, offers one explanation of the distribution of a haplogroup, that Family Tree DNA currently dates to a TMRCA (Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor) of 761 BCE - representing a range of between 1230 BCE and 328 BCE.

Although the people who lived here at this time were to be increasingly identified as belonging to Hallstatt Culture, their Urnfield practices continued.  Almost all of their dead were cremated, cheating modern geneticists of their ancient DNA. The ashes of their loved ones were then placed in distinctive urns, which would be buried in vast urn fields, devoid of mounds.

Their settlements were often small, open villages located on fertile river terraces. Within timber-framed longhouses and pit-houses, walled with wattle and daub, they lived under roofs of thatched reed harvested from the wetlands. There is archaeological evidence that the walls of the houses may have been decorated with red or geometric patterns (triangles or spirals).

However, people were just beginning to move back up onto the Devín and Braunsberg heights for protection as social tensions rose. Society was becoming "heroic" in the Homeric sense; power was held by local "big men" who proved their worth through feasting and gift-giving. Into this mix, the new technology of iron was arriving.

Interestingly, ancient DNA studies from the broader Iron Age suggest that many of these communities practiced matrilocality or maintained strong maternal clan structures. The women here may have been the permanent heart of the community, while men moved between tribes to forge alliances.

There were also larger hillforts, such as those crowning the heights of the Devín Gate. These forts featured box ramparts that would have appeared as massive white or grey stone walls from a distance. Here, the chieftains and elites resided.

These people loved colour. They used natural dyes such as woad (blue), madder (red), and weld (yellow), and plaid-like patterns (checked weaving) were already in use. Jewellery was bold—heavy bronze neck-rings (torcs) and "spectacle" fibulae (large brooch-pins made of coiled wire).

Perhaps, my one hundred-times great-grandmother was here? Maybe that is her weaving above? My mtDNA H6a1a8 ancestor.

GO TO NEXT ACT OPTION A - Early Jastorf culture, The Elbe, Altmark, North German plain. 500 BCE


Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

Ovum Act 6 Option A Early Jastorf culture, Altmark, North German Plain 500 BCE

Back to the FutureTime Travel and Haplogroup Index

Copyright Source ©  OpenStreetMap contributors.

The map above highlights the area discussed in this post: Altmark, situated around the River Elbe on the North German Plain. In this post, I am exploring the journey of my matrilineage, defined by the mitochondrial DNA haplogroup H6a1a8 (specifically the private variant cluster F8693412).

This lineage could, of course, have arrived in East Anglia via several routes; I am presenting only two. In Option B, the lineage arrives via a Hallstatt bride reaching South East Britain during the Earlier Iron Age. Here, in Option A, I follow an Anglo-Saxon route. In this scenario, the lineage moved northwards from an Eastern Alpine origin and, by 500 BCE, existed within the early Jastorf culture along the River Elbe.

The Jastorf archaeological culture is often seen as connected to the emergence of later, Germanic peoples.

Did my ninety-times great-grandmother live among these people?

The Environment The landscape is a mosaic of sandy pine barrens, fertile loess soils ideal for agriculture, and the wide, unpredictable floodplains of the River Elbe. This low-lying, sandy plain is dissected by numerous tributaries, making settlement a matter of strategy. Communities cling to the ‘islands’ of higher, drier ground (Geest) to escape the seasonal flooding of the marshlands.

Climate The ‘Subatlantic’ climatic phase has taken hold; consequently, it is cooler and wetter than in previous centuries. This persistent dampness dictates every facet of life, from the construction of houses to the specific crops sown. For the Jastorf farmers, floods are a frequent and formidable seasonal hazard.

Jastorf and the Three-Aisled Longhouse

​The social unit is centered on the Three-Aisled Longhouse. These are impressive timber-frame structures with wattle-and-daub walls and thatched roofs. They are a shared space: Humans and livestock live under one roof. The cattle occupy one end, their body heat helping to warm the central living area where the hearth fire never truly goes out.

Subsistence: These are skilled farmers. They grow emmer wheat, barley, and millet, but there is an increasing reliance on flax (for linen) and gold-of-pleasure (for oil).

​Hardiness: Life is a constant negotiation with the soil. They supplement their diet with intensive foraging for acorns, hazelnuts, and wild berries.

This is a largely egalitarian, tribal society, but "big men" or local chieftains are again beginning to emerge. 

​The Cult of the Dead: Cremation is the standard. The ashes are placed in ceramic urns and are also buried in vast "urnfields." In the Altmark, these cemeteries are often reused for generations, creating a deep sense of ancestral continuity.

The Sacred Bog: The surrounding wetlands are seen as portals to the divine. It is common to deposit "votive offerings"—fine pottery, weapons, or even sacrificed animals—into the peat as gifts to deities that govern the rain and the harvest.

The Nienburg Group The Nienburg Group are seen as significant pioneers of the later Germanic cultures—the "bridge-builders" of European culture. In the centuries to follow, they will be in contact and trading with Belgic groups expanding from the Danube in the south to the western boundaries of the Nienburg Group. If my ninety-times great-grandmother is not already here in 500 BCE, perhaps it is then that her lineage will arrive?

Iron The Bronze Age was now fading. Europe was no longer dependent on the importation of bronze, copper, and tin, as iron had become commonplace. Our Jastorf ancestors were very likely to have harvested bog iron—mineral deposits that settled during repeated floods. They could collect these small pellets of raw iron and forge them into tools far sharper than those made of bronze.

Although it required the arduous labour of forging and hammering, the end product was inexpensive, locally sourced, and durable. Crucially, it could be repaired. Human relationships and their respective cultures shifted in response to these new implements. While bronze had been a symbol of elite status, iron became the practical, everyday tool of the Northern European farmers.

GO TO NEXT ACT OPTION A - Late Jastorf culture / proto-Lombards. Middle/Lower Elbe, North German Plain. 200 BCE


Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

Tas Valley - Local Day Trip

Another day off from work. I didn't want to go far today, the weather has turned pretty poor for photography and travel. So a couple of very close sites here in Norfolk. According to current genetic studies of the British Isles, the Roman period doesn't seem to have had any noticeable impact on the population genetics of the British Isles. I think that they are missing something.


Venta Icenorum

First of all, on the Roman front, I visited the site of the Roman town Venta Icenorum, at Caister St Edmund. A display at the site displays this geophysical display, and the following relief:





Entering the field, this is what it looks like:



Heritage groups have preserved the current site by protecting it from cultivation - hence the sheep. The town sat in the valley of a very small river called the Tas. The site is several miles to the south of it's medieval equivalent, Norwich. Questions are being asked, why was it here? The Romans of course were urban people, that controlled from towns, but why here? It was first laid out as a grand plan some decades after the local Boadiccan Rebellion. No sign of significant Iron Age on the site, but some suggestion of a nearby Roman military encampment.



The town has gone, and is best viewed with geophysical maps or by aerial reconnaissance photos. However, it's "defenses" or boundaries are still clearly visible.



The below is a nice feature. A clear perspex panel showing proposed building outlines over the field:



Years ago as I've said before here, I was a very keen voluntary field-walker, or as I'd have preferred "surface collection surveyor". So as I walk across the field, I can't help spotting Roman tile in the mole hills:



The area of Venta Icenorum is very rich in later Anglo-Saxon finds. They do seem to have been attracted to this site, even though the town had long been abandoned before they arrived from the Continent.



As is very common in both prehistoric, and Roman sites, a medieval church stands within the limits of the site. As a sign of continuity, as a scavenge of building material - but also in order to claim dominion over older beliefs, and a return to civilisation:



I hope that you enjoyed Caister St Edmunds. I still had some time to spare, so I decided to visit a site a few miles to the south in the same Norfolk river valley, that I hadn't visited before:


Tasburgh Enclosure

This one is an enigma. An enclosure in Norfolk. I always understood it as an Iron Age Hillfort. The word "hillfort" might not be appropriate in lowland Norfolk, especially as our iron Age enclosures were often in lowland river valleys. Norfolk has a long tradition of "doing different". Excavations have not found Iron Age finds! They have found some evidence of Anglo-Saxon activity, and an opposing hypothesis is that it was a prehistoric enclosure re-used during the wars with the Danes. My personal feeling is that it is late prehistoric, but wait and see - a sign that I found there today seems to suggest some fresh and local based communal research:



A local, rather mucky information board mapping the enclosure:



Outside the northern bank:



Once again, a medieval church sits inside the enclosure. This one, St Mary's, a classic Norfolk round tower job. I can also boast here, that this is one (there are many) of my own personal ancestral churches on my recorded ancestry. Two of my recorded direct ancestors married there in 1794:



I hope that someone out there enjoys my photo-reports.