Davidski published a spreadsheet of his K7 Basal-rich ancient admixture calculator results. I've harvested some of those test results to compare to my own.
Sorted to three admixtures.
1. Villabruna (component of Western Hunter-Gatherer) sorted:
2. Basal-rich (component of Early Neolithic Farmer) sorted:
3. Ancient North Eurasian (component of Copper Age Steppe) sorted:
I was surprised just how much Villabruna I had in my results, but clearly, this component is found not only in Villabruna, but also in Iceman / Sardinia (Neolithic Farmer) at 53-55%, and in Steppe Yamna (Bronze Age Steppe) at 34%. Therefore I have inherited substantial Villabruna not perhaps directly, but from early admixtures via Neolithic and Bronze Age settlement of Western Europe.
On Villabruna sorted, my closest neighbours are indeed other British - English, Scottish, and also Dutch and Anglo-Saxon ancient. I'm correctly positioned.
This one is an enigma, but it repeats in other calculators. I receive more Southern European / Neolithic than do most British or indeed North West Europeans. I do have one Swiss 3 x great grandparent, but otherwise, all of my recorded genealogy is South East English. I have more Basal-rich than do other "British" results in the spreadsheet. Why is that? Could have the randomness of genetic recombination given me just a little more of that Swiss line than I should normally expect, or do I have another ancestor from the South within the past several generations, that I'm not yet aware of? Living DNA suggests Tuscan in their test.
My neighbours in Basal-rich are East French, Dutch, and Swiss.
3. Ancient north Eurasian.
This trades with my Basal-rich results. I usually have less Steppe than I would normally expect as a Brit or as a North West European. More Neolithic, less Bronze Age Steppe. It does suggest some unknown Southern European ancestry.
My ANE neighbours are East French, Swiss, and North Italian. One ancient British result not too far away is Romano-British 6DT18. He was a young male (aged 16 to 18 years at death), in a multiple grave with three other men, at Driffield Terrace, York. He carried Y haplogroup R1b1a2a1a.
In summary, for a Brit, even for an Englishman, I have just about expected percentages of Villabruna and Western Hunter-Gatherer ancestry. However, something is atypical in the other two founder mixes. I look more like French or Swiss, with more Basal-rich (Neolithic) and less ANE (Steppe) than the average British or even English.
This is the K11 admixture calculator with rarer alleles created by Dilawer Kahn, now available for a small fee as a test on Geneplaza. I had previously commissioned Dilawer to run my 23andme DNA raw data through the calculator, but this is a nicer presentation. The test seeks to estimate ancient ancestry admixture using his rarer alleles principle.
Western European Hunter Gatherers
"These were the indigenous populations of Europe that substantially contributed to the genetics of modern Europeans. It is believed that these hunter gatherers arrived in Europe around 45000 years ago from the Near East.".
My Western European Hunter-gatherer admix is 21.7%
"This population introduced farming to Europe during the Neolithic, and were very likely descended from Neolithic farmers from the Near East. Their genetic signature is best preserved in modern Sardinians and other southern Europeans.".
My Neolithic European admix is 21.7%
"These early farmers from Anatolia from about 8000 years ago were the ancestors of the Early European farmers that introduced farming to SE Europe, and replaced the hunter-gatherer cultures that lived there.".
My Neolithic Anatolian admix is 16.4%
"The Andronovo culture is a collection of similar local Bronze Age cultures that flourished around 3000-4000 years ago in western Siberia and the west Asiatic steppe. This culture overlapped with the Srubna culture in the Volga-Ural region of Russia.".
My Andronova-Srubnaya admix is 14.6%
"The Yamna culture (also known as the Pit Grave culture), was an early Bronze Age culture from the Pontic Eurasian steppe from around 5000 years ago. The Yamna culture is identified with the late Proto-Indo-Europeans, and is the strongest candidate for the homeland of the Proto-Indo-European language.
My Yamnaya-Poltavka admix is 12.6%
"Based on Neolithic and chalcolithic period samples recovered from Northwest Iran. The farmers from the Zagros mountain Iran region descended from one of multiple, genetically differentiated hunter-gatherer populations in southwestern Asia. They are estimated to have separated from Early Neolithic farmers in Anatolia some 46,000 to 77,000 years ago, and show affinities to modern-day Kurd, Iranian, Pakistani and Afghan populations. The Neolithic Iranian references used for this component, were recovered from the Kurdistan region of Iran, and appear to be around 9000 years old. The Chalcolithic Iranian references have been dated to around 5000 years old.".
My Neolithic-Chalcolithic Iran admix is 7.6%
Neolithic-Bronze Age Levant
"Based on neolithic and bronze-age period samples recovered from the Levant area in the Middle-East. The references for the bronze age Levant farmer (BA) samples were recovered from the Ain Ghazal, Jordan area and were dated to about 4300 years ago. The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter-gatherers. By the time of the Bronze Age, these two populations and Anatolian-related farmers had mixed with each other and with the hunter- gatherers of Europe to drastically reduce genetic differentiation. The impact of the Near Eastern farmers extended beyond the Near East: farmers related to those of Anatolia spread westward into Europe; farmers related to those of the Levant spread southward into East Africa; farmers related to those from Iran spread northward into the Eurasian steppe; and people related to both the early farmers of Iran and to the pastoralists of he Eurasian steppe spread eastward into South Asia.".
My Neolithic-Bronze Age Levant admix is 4.4%
"Eastern Non Africans (ENAs) are one of the earliest splits from humans that migrated out of Africa to the Near East around 100,000 years ago. It is believed that ENAs split from the population in the Near East around 50,000 years ago. Populations such as the Andamanese Onge and Papuans are modern descendants of ENAs. The ENA component here is based on Papuan references.".
My Eastern Non-African admix is 1%
Any autosomal DNA tests for ancestry admixture have to be understood under a number of conditions:
Timeline. for what period in the past is this ancestry being weighed?
Population. How are the proposed admixture populations quantified and distinguished? Where did they live? Are they associated with any archaeological culture? What are the references - are they based on ancient DNA or inferred in modern populations? What previous populations were they admixed from?
Admixture is repetitive. What we are looking at are ancient migrations, population expansions (sometimes marked with culture, sometimes not), admixture - sometimes with strong sex bias, displacements - all in prehistory, long before any written record. It's like rows of jars of mixed sweets, resulting by mixing, and remixing. Even siblings can have slightly different "flavours".
How does the above K11 compare with some of my previous ancient admixture calculations? How about the K7 Basal-rich for example? It looks at a different admix, from an earlier time, but do they make sense together?
David Wesolowski's K7 Basal-rich test
The Villabruna cluster represents the DNA found in 13 individuals in Europe from after 14,000 years ago. They were Late Ice Age hunter-gatherers. They appear to have links with the Near East. The current thought is that they replaced earlier groups of hunter-gatherers in Europe. The DNA of people in the Middle East and Europe pulled together at this time, and they may represent an expansion from the South-East. Much of the Aegean Sea would have been dry, with low sea levels (glaciation), so the migration may have been easy. It is believed that they had dark skin, and blue eyes. They were possibly, the last hunter-gatherers of Europe and the Middle East. They may have contributed to our DNA both through or either, later Asian or European admixtures.
David gives the English average as 56.7%. My result is 57.1%
The Basal Eurasians are a hypothetical "ghost" population derived from DNA studies. It is suggested that they splintered from other modern humans 45,000 years ago, presumably outside of Africa, somewhere around the Middle East. They significantly contributed DNA to the Early Neolithic Farmers of the Fertile Crescent and Anatolia, and consequently, on to all of us modern West Eurasians.
David gives the English average as 26.5%. My result is 28.8%
Ancient North Eurasian
Another Ice Age hunter-gatherer "Ghost" population, but this one has been associated with human remains and an Upper Palaeolithic culture (Mal'ta-Buret') at Lake Baikal, Siberia. We know that it significantly contributes to modern West Eurasians, through earlier admixture on the Eurasian Steppes. Copper Age pastoralists then carried it westwards into Europe with their later expansion.
David gives the English average as 16.6%. My result is 14.0%
Comparing K7 Basal-rich to K11 Neolithic & Bronze Age
The K7 Villabruna should relate I feel, to the K11 Western European Hunter-Gatherer. It's quite different. The K7 gives me 57%. The K11 gives me only 22%. Refer back to the Discussion further up. Different admixes, different times. I was surprised at the high Villabruna percentages when I recieved the results. Some of that Villabruna could have gone into other later admixes that are represented in the K11 populations.
The K7 gave me a higher-than-average (for a North west European) percentage of Basal-rich at 29%. This is an earlier ghost population, that hasn't yet been securely associated with ancient DNA or an archaeological culture, but has been inferred as a component of Early Neolithic Farmers in the Middle East and Anatolia. That could have gone into some of the later K11 Neolithic populations such as Neolithic European (22%), Neolithic Anatolian (16%), and Neolithic-Bronze Age Levant (4%).
The K7 gave me 14% ANE (Ancient North Eurasian), which is low for a North West European. The fashionable thought is that ANE went into Yamna-Poltavka Steppe as a significant component, before being carried into North West Europe by Copper Age Steppe pastoralists. K11 gave me 13% Yamna, and 15% Andronovo.
Comparing my K11 results wnot with the K7, but with other K11 testers online, my results are not that atypical for a North west European at all. I still fit in pretty well with other people of North West European ancestry.
The new K11 Ancients Common and Rarer Alleles tests are being run by Dilawer Khan, creator of the Gedrosia stable of admixture calculators available on GEDMatch.com, and of the EurasianDNA.com website. This new test uses a new set of principles, based on using ADMIXTURE to produce more reliable ancient results. I commissioned him to run my own 23andMe file through the tests, to produce the following results and PCA's/
PCA for Common Alleles (my position "Norfolk"):
PCA for Rarer Alleles (my position "Norfolk"):
The K11 Ancients common Alleles results should reflect the older ancestry most accurately. In summary, that gave me:
48.6% Neolithic Farmer
26.5% Copper Age Steppe Pastoralist
24.9% Western Hunter-Gatherer
Thank you Dilawer.
How have other tests seen similar admixture?
I previously commissioned David Wesolowski (Eurogenes stable on GEDMatch and of Eurogenes Blog) to run my raw file through his K7 Basal-rich test. He produced the following results:
14% Ancient North Eurasian.
These are two very different tests, of admixture between different sets of population, of different time periods. What I do find interesting is the 14% percentage of ANE (Ancient north Eurasian) relates quite favourably to what I understand it's admixture percentage is to Yamna or Steppe pastoralist. Dilawer gives me 26.5% Steppe. I have previously heard that the Yamna were circa 50% ANE, and the remainder of mixture of other Western Eurasian Hunter-Gatherer groups, including Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers.
The K11 Ancients test does suggest that I have a surprisingly high amount of ancestry from the Neolithic Farmers, that were in Europe previous to the arrival of the Steppe migrants around 4,900 years ago. This is actually consistent with my other Ancient admixture test results. The K7 Basal-rich test for example, had given me 28.8% Basal. The Basal Eurasians are a hypo-theoretical "ghost" population that was among the founding admixture of the Neolithic Farmers, in a similar way that the ANE were among the founding admixture of the Steppe Pastoralists. Again then, the two tests do tally reasonably well in determining where my personal percentages of ancient DNA originate.
Why do I have so high percentages of Neolithic Farmer and Basal Eurasian I do not know. My DNA flavour is a slight extreme, and atypical even for an English person, and more so for a Briton. My recorded genealogy is all SE English, mainly East Anglian. I would love to see the results of other East Anglians, as I suspect to them, that I am not such an extreme. However, even if this was the case, it doesn't explain why modern East Anglians would have lower Steppe, and more Neolithic than either West British, Scandinavians, or even ancient DNA from Anglo-Saxons. Higher percentages of Neolithic ancestry today are usually found to the South, peaking in Sardinia, then Iberia. A favoured explanation is that the SE English could have had a lot of input from the South, via the French during Norman and Medieval periods. I'm not totally convinced - yet.
A third new ancient admixture test that I might use here in the MDLP Project Modern K11. On GEDMatch Oracle, it proposes a number of genetic distances to ancient DNA samples:
If I look at four population distances, then based on the samples available in the test, I'm looking pretty European Bell Beaker, with Corded Ware and Yamna appearing. My closest single population in the samples is a surprising British Celtic! More samples from the European Neolithic might turn those results around.
The Caucasus. By NASA/MODIS - Jacques Descloitres, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=1939) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.
I grew up in the age where archaeology was the main driver behind our understanding of the distant past. It still plays an important role in helping us to understand our human past before writing, and to sometimes correct our understanding of our past ever since the advent of writing.
During the past 24 months however, there has been a silent revolution. It has been read by what is inside of us, the story of human DNA, and a foray into exploring and mapping ancient human DNA. It is rewriting the prehistory of Western Eurasia.
First of all, we have to stop retaining ideas that somehow, Western Europeans are an isolate population. We are the result of admixture after admixture, across Eurasia. The DNA of humans from Ireland to Iran is strikingly similar. We are a combination of different admixtures from different populations that lived 1) North of the Caucasus, 2) South of the Caucasus, and 3) Europe. The Caucasus, as in the photo above, has been the great division between peoples, that allowed local Western Asian populations to divide, that then to admixed in both Western Asia, and in Europe.
This revelation is not yet widely known. Even many professional archaeologists remain unaware, or skeptical about this new tool. New migrations and admixture events are being discovered, into Europe, and across Eurasia that contradict previous consensus.
The Founder Populations
The latest evidence suggests that the earlier humans and their cultures of Ice Age Europe, did not survive all of the fluctuations in climate. A new genome arrived and established 14,000 to 7,000 years ago, as represented by the Villabruna Cluster of human remains. These last hunter-gatherers appear to have less Neanderthal DNA, and a closer relationship to Near East populations than did earlier Europeans. They may have migrated into Europe when much of the Aegean Sea dried towards the end of the Ice Age. These late hunter-gatherers may have contributed DNA to modern Western Eurasians both inside Europe, and in West Asia. When Early Neolithic Farmers arrived in NW Europe, it was probably the descendants of the Villabruna Type that they encountered. They may have admixed with them. A genetic legacy from these populations appears to be blue eyes.
South of the Caucasus
The Fertile Crescent spawned the Neolithic Revolution of Agriculture. A distinctive genetic "ghost" population that has been named the Basal Eurasians significantly contributed to their DNA, along with other hunter-gatherer populations within the area. Their descendants, the Early Neolithic Farmers, took agriculture, wheat, barley, sheep, goats, cattle, and pigs - along with pottery production, and polished flint axe heads across the Levant, to North Africa, Anatolia, and then on to Europe. Along the way, they may have admixed with the hunter-gatherer populations that they displaced. Today, their surviving DNA signal in Europe, is strongest in Sardinia, followed by the remainder of Southern Europe.
North of the Caucasus
Arable agriculture made only a temporary appearance on the Pontic and Caspian Steppes, but was soon replaced by pastoralism and a very different way of life. The horse was well adapted to life on the Steppes, and humans there domesticated it. Mounted on horses, they could control larger flocks and herds of livestock. They also introduced wheeled carts, enabling them to easily mobilise to the best pastures depending on season and climate change. They also encountered and mastered the new copper then bronze working technologies. Steppe pastoralists could range long distances across the Steppe Corridor across Eurasia. They were also adapting by natural selection to a dairy based diet, with a rising percentage of lactose tolerance into adulthood. A significant contribution to their DNA came from a group of Siberian hunter-gatherers known to population geneticists as the Ancient North Eurasian. The copper age archaeological culture associated with this genetic group is the Yamna or Yamnaya.
Yamna Culture Tomb. By XVodolazx (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
What happened in Europe?
Villabruna types entered Europe around 15,000 years ago, perhaps from the Near East. They may have replaced earlier groups of European hunter-gatherers.
Early Neolithic Farmers from south of the Caucasus, then spread into Europe around 7,000 years ago, both across the Balkans into Central Europe, and also along the Mediterranean coast, bringing agriculture and pottery. They may have at times admixed with hunter-gatherers within Europe. However, their much better abilities at food production created a wave of displacement that must have been hard to resist. They could rear so many more children. By 5,000 years ago, their descendants dominated Europe.
Eurasian Steppe Pastoralists from north of the Caucasus, then spread into Eastern Europe around 4,100 years ago. Why wasn't there a resistance from the Early Neolithic Farmers living there? Latest research suggests that the Steppe Pastoralists had contracted a plague strain known as Yersinia pestis from Central Asia. The current favoured hypothesis is that they may have accidentally spread this disease to less resistant Neolithic Farmer populations in Europe. Some plots in Neolithic activity do indeed suggest a crisis at this time. Therefore, the Steppe Warriors could easily dominate the depleted and weakened social structures of the Neolithic Europeans. They brought with them, an Indo-European language, that appears to be the ancestor of most present day European languages.
In Europe, the fusion had a clear sex bias, with many Neolithic mitochondrial DNA haplogroups surviving, while Steppe Y haplogroups such as R1A still dominate today. The fusion also seemed to give rise to a new archaeological culture known as the Corded Ware.
We know that the Yamnaya expansion didn't stop at all in Eastern Europe, it continued into Western Europe. A fusion culture may be the Bell Beaker of the Early Bronze Age. Again, a sex bias, with some mtDNA haplogroups surviving, but a strong dominance of Steppe Y haplogroups including the many clades of R1b. Indeed, some of this domination is strongest on the Western edge of Eurasia, in places such as Iberia, Ireland, and Scotland, where later admixture events failed to reach - but the Steppe Pastoralists had dominated, particularly in male haplogroups.
How does this relate to this East Anglian?
According to the latest K7 Basal-rich test by David Wesolowski of the Eurogenes Blog, my ancestral breakdown of my autosomal DNA, around 14,000 years ago would be:
57% Villabruna-type (Europe and the Near East)
29% Basal-rich (Middle East)
14% Ancient North Eurasian (Siberia)
My Y haplogroup (L-SK1414) ancestor would have most likely been an ibex hunter in the area of present-day Iran and Iraq, possibly in the valleys of Mesopotamia, and or the Zagros Mountains of Iran.
My mtDNA ancestor would have been Eurasian - by 4,400 years ago, a woman of the Yamnaya, on the Pontic and Caspian Steppes, in a pastoralist tribe.
So, you get where this is taking me. Step back into prehistory, and what DNA is revealing to me is that my ancestors were NOT all in Britain, or even all in Europe. They were scattered across Siberia, the Steppes, the Caucasus, the Zagros, the Middle East, the Levant, and go further back, to Africa.
Alternatively, the equally recent Global 10 test, run by my friend Helgenes50 of the Anthrogenica board, resulted in:
These two tests may not actually conflict, as they are essentially tests referring to the Eurasian populations of two different time periods, with different admixtures. The K7 Basal-rich test refers to my proposed ancestral populations towards the end of the last Ice Age. The Global 10 test refers to more recent admixture leading up to the Bronze Age.
Here I map the ancestral events as recorded on my Gramps genealogical database. These events can be baptisms, marriages, census records, etc. The larger the dot, the more events for that particular parish. I have modified images of Southern England from OpenStreetMap.org Copyright attribution-sharealike 2.0 generic.
My Mother's Ancestral Events.
This includes the recorded events for my mother's 134 recorded direct ancestors and siblings. As you can see, her known ancestry over the past 330 years has been incredibly localised! All English. All East Anglian. Almost entirely in Norfolk - with one line drifting back to nearby Suffolk. An incredibly dense cluster in East Norfolk, around the River Yare in Broadland. Sure enough second cousin and third cousin marriages have been detected in her tree.
My Father's Ancestral Events
This includes the recorded events for my late father's 116 recorded direct ancestors and siblings. A little more travelled over the past 330 years, although I feel that the events record has a bias in research to show this - as indeed, I estimate his known Norfolk ancestry over the past 330 years to amount to at least 70% of his combined heritage. Nonetheless, some of his lines trace back temporarily to London, then back mainly to Oxfordshire and the Thames Valley. All South-East English again.
None of this makes my family any more special than any other family anywhere else in the World, with any type of recent heritage and admixture. Indeed, the English are a particularly admixed population. However, in testing commercial DNA tests for ancestry, I feel that we offer a good reference sample of SE English, and even East Anglian Norfolk.
I'm particularly interested in how these commercial DNA companies are failing to discriminate ancient or population admixture, from recent (350 years) family admixture. Some populations they are able to detect with some certainty and accuracy. However, others such as the English, not at all. They are unable - despite their claims otherwise, to break recent autosomal admixture on lines over the past ten generations, from earlier, sometimes much earlier population admixtures.
I'm looking forward to seeing if the new Living DNA test fares any better, with it's rich British data set.
Attribution: Fielding Lucas, Jr. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
This post is partly an excuse to upload and store the above creative commons image. My Y-DNA terminal SNP (L-SK1414) twin was a Balochi speaker in Makran, SW Pakistan. In classical times, Makran was located in the Kingdom of Gedrosia. It's almost ironic that an open source range of autosomal DNA testers on GEDmatch have been named after Gedrosia.
Gedrosia was a dry, mountainous country along the northwestern shores of the Indian Ocean. The indigenous name for Gedrosia is thought to have been Gwadar. It was conquered by the Persian king Cyrus the Great (559-530 BC). The capital of Gedrosia was Pura, which may survive today as modern Bampûr. In 326 BC, The Macedonian king, Alexander the Great disastrously crossed the Gedrosian Desert, on the return from his campaign in India, and lost 12,000 of his men to the savage conditions.
Image of Gwadar Bay by wetlandsofpakistan (Gwadar - West Bay) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons.
So, although the GedrosiaDNA GEDmatch heritage calculators may have little to do with the legendary land that may have been host to my Y ancestors, out of interest, how do our atDNA test results tally with the GedrosiaDNA calculators? These calculators are designed to measure Ancient Eurasian Admixture.
My results (using an FT-DNA raw file) against those of my mother (23andMe raw file).
My Eurasia K9 ASI Oracle:
39% Western Hunter-Gatherer
27% Early Neolithic Farmer
15% Eastern Hunter-Gatherer
12% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
7% SW Asian
1% Siberian East Asian
Mother's Eurasia K9 ASI Oracle:
40% Western Hunter-Gatherer
26% Early Neolithic Farmer
14% Eastern Hunter-Gatherer
12% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
6% SW Asian
1% Siberian East Asian
My Gedrosia K3 Oracle:
97.5% West Eurasian
2.5% East Eurasian
Mother's Gedrosia K3 Oracle:
96% West Eurasian
4% East Eurasian
My Gedrosia K15 Oracle:
40% Western Hunter-Gatherer
25% Early European Farmer
5% SW Asian
Mother's Gedrosia K15 Oracle:
40% Western Hunter-Gatherer
24% Early European Farmer
My Ancient Eurasia K6 Oracle:
40% West European Hunter-Gatherer
21% Ancient North Eurasian
1% East Asian
Mother's Ancient Eurasia K6 Oracle:
41% West European Hunter-Gatherer
19% Ancient North Eurasian
2% Ancient South Eurasian
1% East Asian
We both appear to have inherited around 40% of our DNA from ancient Western (European) Hunter-Gatherer populations, nothing unexpected there. Western Hunter-Gatherers not only lived in Europe, but appear to have contributed to some later Eurasian populations such as the Yamnaya and Early European Farmers.
We both have low counts of Ancient North Eurasian - particularly my mother, who scores only 19% ANE (Upper-Paleolithic genomes from the Lake Baikal region of Siberia, identified as Malta, Afontogora 2, and Afontogora 3, dated to 17 to 24 kya). It has been noted during online discussions, that the English appear to have slightly lower percentages of ANE than do their close neighbours. ANE is sometimes used to indicate Yamnaya ancestry (ANE was a component), that spread from the Eurasian Steppes into Western Europe during the Early Bronze Age.
I have 3% Balochi compared to 1% Balochi for my mother. It may mean nothing, but it could just perhaps indicate something in the autosomes that associates on my paternal side with my Y-DNA story. The indicators (particularly K15) suggest that I have more SW Asian ancestry, presumably from my paternal side - again, it just could associate with what we know about my Y haplogroup L-SK1414.
We have around 24-25% Early European Farmer ancestry, representing early Neolithic descendants of an admix of WHG and "Basal Eurasians". This signal apparently peaks around 80% in modern Sardinians. However, the "Natufian" reference are higher - 38-39%. According to GEDmatch: "Natufian was an Epipaleolithic culture that existed from 12,500 to 9,500 BC in the area of Israel. They were derived about 50% from an original Out-of-Africa population, referred to as Basal Eurasians. If you are a European and show Natufian admixture, this does not imply that Natufians interacted with your ancestors. All it means is that Natufian like admixture was mediated to you via intermediaries, such as the early European Farmers from the Near East". I'm not sure what to make of that.
The above photograph taken by me, of Neolithic skulls from the Tomb of the Sea Eagles, Orkney.
I'm not the only English person reporting "Southern European" on their Autosomal DNA for Ancestry test results. I've noticed that on 23andMe, for example, that English often report these strange low percentages of "Southern European" in their ancestry composition results.
There may be something odd about the ancient ancestry of the English, that we do not yet know. Others have also pointed out that in ancient admixture calculators, that the English receive lower percentages of ANE (Ancient North Eurasian) than do the Irish, Scottish, or other nearby neighbours. POBI (People of the British Isles 2015) suggested a unknown immigration into Southern Britain during Late Prehistory perhaps from the area that is now France.
Some point to perhaps, more Neolithic survival in lowland Britain, relating perhaps to Sardinian patterns. Others suggest immigration from Southern Europe and elsewhere during 360 years of Roman occupation.
Option 2 is a possibility - perhaps these is something about English ancestry that we do not yet know about, that confuses the algorithms of commercial DNA companies, when trying to identify our more recent ancestry.