data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb484/cb4841ecf5d62ca9ef1ecbb855c908710b452586" alt="Image: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4221/34022864624_25a68eb292_b.jpg"
Indeed, the only way that I found it was through online resources and my GPS:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebe86/ebe86d29f791a667c4b86b963d8563e58359c025" alt="Image: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4195/34022890494_43887494b3_b.jpg"
It was first spotted in 1929 - a first in the history of aerial photography for archaeology. It was excavated in 1935:
The ambiance can only detected by the imaginative. As a seasoned time traveller, it gave me the kick, despite it being in a horse field, with overhead HV power cables, right next to a major power sub station for the City of Norwich:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d1dc/3d1dca12ed0765c0b3305846f93cd48bab84005b" alt="Image: https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4220/34055885563_9bb9e9aefe_b.jpg"
Not really an attraction for tourists. No standing stones. this is East Anglia, we don't have boulder-stones. The Neolithic creators of this site erected earthworks and massive timbers - the post-holes that sometimes be seen from above. Incidentally, in archaeology, a "Henge" is not a stone circle. Stone circles were sometimes erected inside a henge, often later. It's a circular bank and ditch earthwork, with the ditch on the inside - as though keeping something in - a defensive rampart has the ditch on the outside. A henge keeps something "in". Interesting is that the most famous henge - Stonehenge, breaks that convention.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/698db/698db6e9a73982c12af9829ad1165ff9c40f5eab" alt=""
Looking up at the site of the Henge from the nearby water course at the bottom of the valley.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc65d/dc65ddd23ffd81d2fa4295754fc9fcdebd05e3e5" alt=""
and the modern water course itself.
If you've seen my posts in this section before, you know that I like to do a little mole hill archaeology:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea5bc/ea5bcf132c04d2ae6b57b363b9102f1de4de3bf1" alt=""
Yes, that's a flint flake in the mole hill. Displaying it's dorsal surface, showing the scars of previously removed flakes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82fb3/82fb3fc722b50ac14f931a80b9c97c2968720933" alt=""
An inspection before returning it to it's topsoil context. I'm here showing you the striking platform, point of impact, and conchoidal fracture bulb. On the right, I can tell you it has wear from being used as a "notched flake", maybe to clean a bone, or an arrow-shaft or similar.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60642/60642260a1658e5a70994648f8ae61fb0af3910f" alt=""
Another flint flake, dorsal surface, showing the scars of previously struck flakes from the core.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b95/93b95b49fa5e53d1bb8a898af75d96569f0faf70" alt=""
Finally, more recent archaeology. A lens cap circa AD 2010?
I hope that someone out there gets some enjoyment from these third person explores of East Anglian sites.