Odyssey of Y Act 8 - Option A Severan Bureaucrat, Romans in Londinium 230 CE

Back to the FutureTime Travel and Haplogroup Index

My yDNA follows the path: L-M20 > M22 > M317 > SK1412 > SK1414 > FGC51041 > FGC51088 > FGC51036. I have been posting episodes detailing events that could have occurred during its 25,000-year journey of development. I traced a journey from its roots in the Zagros and Caucasus mountains to the Levant, culminating in a fictional temple treasurer of Byblos in 64 BCE.

From that point, I have developed two competing hypotheses regarding its leap to the open-field systems of Berkshire. Option A represents the Early Migration or Roman Empire route. In this scenario, my lineage migrates to Londinium, Britannia, via the Romano-Greek colony of Patras and Rome itself, between 180 CE and 205 CE.


A fictional descendant of Phoenician temple treasurers in Byblos had outgrown his Levantine homeland. Seizing the opportunities offered by the Roman Empire, he first relocated to the Greek colony of Patras (Achaia) to bolster his bureaucratic credentials. There, he married a daughter of his Romano-Greek patrons before travelling to Rome itself to receive a new commission.

Septimius Severus (reigned 193–211 CE) was eagerly recruiting administrators from the East to dismantle the entrenched autocracy within his empire. Our ancestor, Aurelius, was keen to advance his career. Yet, once in Rome, he found the appointment to be a formidable challenge—not only for himself but also for his wife and daughter. The posting was Britannia.


The Gateway of Londinium

Home became a town house near the Walbrook stream, a short distance from the massive stone quays of the Thames. To Aurelius’s Greek wife, the docks were a cacophony of damp timber and salted fish—a far cry from her warm home in Achaia. To Aurelius, however, they were his lifeline.

Under Septimius Severus, the province was being transformed into a supply base for the Emperor’s planned campaigns in the North. Aurelius’s days were spent at the Forum, the largest building of its kind north of the Alps, overseeing the arrival of Spanish oil, Gaulish wine, and the local grain destined to feed the legions at Eboracum (York).

On the Road: The Procurement Trail

Aurelius’s duties took him away from the comforts of the capital and onto the straight, paved arteries of Watling Street and the Ermine Way. His task was the annona militaris—the requisitioning of supplies for the army. In the South and East, he met with local civitas leaders; men who styled themselves as Roman senators but still spoke with the lilt of the Belgae or the Iceni. In the ‘palace’ at Fishbourne, he negotiated with regional administrators who were eager to prove their loyalty to the new African Emperor.

The era of independent British kings was largely over, yet the chieftains still held sway over the rural populations. Aurelius had to be a diplomat; he needed their cattle, their leather for tents, and their lead from the Mendip Hills. He carried the authority of an emperor who did not care for tradition. If a local magistrate grumbled about the grain tax, Aurelius reminded them—perhaps with a touch of Levantine wit—that Severus rewarded loyalty but had little patience for the ‘old ways’ of the Italian elite.

The Domestic Struggle

The ‘great challenge’ he had feared in Rome manifested in the small details of daily life. He likely spent a fortune on hypocaust heating, burning endless cords of wood to keep his growing family warm during the ‘perpetual mist’ of the British winter. Whilst he could procure the finest Mediterranean imports for the Governor’s table, his own family had to adapt to local butter instead of olive oil, and the heavy, hopped ales of the North instead of the sweet wines of Achaia.

A Man of Two Worlds

Aurelius was a ‘Severan Man’—a product of a meritocratic, globalised empire. In the morning, he might have offered incense to Mithras or the Syrian Goddess in a small shrine by the London docks; in the afternoon, he was a cold-eyed bureaucrat calculating the weight of British wool.

He was the bridge between the ancient traditions of the East and the raw, developing frontier of the West. He was not just living in Britain; he was building the Roman machinery that kept it pinned to the map of the world.


In 235 CE, on the docks of Londinium, Aurelius heard the news: the assassination of Alexander Severus.

In March of that year, the last of the Syrian line, Alexander Severus, had been murdered by his own troops at Mogontiacum (Mainz, Germany). He was killed alongside his mother, Julia Mamaea—the woman who had effectively governed the Empire. For Aurelius, this was the death of his patron. The new Emperor, Maximinus Thrax, was a career soldier who had risen from the ranks; he had no use for the sophisticated ‘Eastern’ civil administrators favoured by the Severans. To the new regime, men like Aurelius were viewed as ‘palace softies’ who had drained the treasury on bureaucracy rather than the army.

The shift would have been felt instantly in Londinium. Aurelius gathered his family—which now included two daughters and a younger son. They were in grave danger. His only advantage was being among the first to receive the news at the quayside. He acted quickly before his property could be confiscated. Prepared for such a crisis, Aurelius had already formulated an emergency plan: an escape up the Thames with his wealth to a refuge he had kept secret.

Aurelius Belicatus (the son) By 250 CE, Aurelius the senior had passed away, succeeded by his son, Aurelius Belicatus, as head of the household. The farmstead was now developing into a respectable villa. He had married a young, local British wife.


The lineage remained, surviving into the mid-18th century as copyhold tenants. No longer following the imperial bureaucratic rules of movement, the paternal line now adhered to an agricultural rule of stability.

In the villages of the Thames Valley, across the borders of Berkshire and Oxfordshire, the family held their place not by deed, but by the "custom of the manor". Their names were etched into the manorial court rolls, securing their right to the land through generations of quiet husbandry. The ancient Levantine heritage, once carried by soldiers or traders across vast distances, was now tethered to a few acres of English soil—preserved by the very permanence of the feudal tradition.


With each passing generation, the lineage becomes increasingly British, then more specifically English. Few would ever guess at the ancient Asian heritage encoded within the nucleotides of the Y-DNA. That a line of descent has its roots in the Zagros Mountains, and later among the Hurrians and Phoenicians, could remain forgotten for over 1,700 years.

Whether one prefers the "Early Migration" theory or the "Late Migration" narrative—centred on late-medieval Venetian galleys—the genetic reality remains the same. We know that Y-DNA L-M20 > M22 > M317 > SK1412 > SK1414 > FGC51041 > FGC51088 > FGC51036 originated in Western Asia (most likely the Zagros or South Caucasus). It likely moved into the Levant, where it persisted as an uncommon, narrow "ghost" haplogroup. Eventually—whether in antiquity or more recently—it reached Southern Britain, where it remains incredibly rare today.

GO TO NEXT ACT - Option A. Medieval Thames Valley villeins. 1432 CE


Back to the Future: Time Travel and Haplogroup Index

Royal Norfolk Regiment Tour of Korea and Hong Kong 1951/2. Gallery 3

GO TO KOREA ROYAL NORFOLK REGIMENT PHOTO GALLERY 1

Korean War Gallery 3 of 6. AI restoration and colourisation of b/w negative scans by Google Gemini. Royal Norfolk Regiment. 1951-1952 Korea and Hong Kong Tour. Although Ray had the negatives, and perhaps the camera, you can see him on many of these images.

The USS Consolation: A Floating Sanctuary

​Among the images of frontline grit and regimental camaraderie, this photograph of the USS Consolation (AH-15) stands out as a symbol of the immense scale of the UN medical effort. A Haven-class hospital ship, the Consolation was a frequent sight in Korean waters, often stationed at Pusan (Busan) or Inchon to provide life-saving care to those wounded in the rugged hills.

​The ship is unmistakable with its pristine white hull, bold red crosses, and the American flag at the stern. For a National Service man in the Royal Norfolk Regiment, seeing a vessel like this in the harbour was a sobering reminder of the war’s cost, but also a source of reassurance. These ships were marvels of the time, fully equipped with operating theatres, X-ray labs, and hundreds of hospital beds, often staffed by dedicated medical personnel from across the United Nations coalition.

This image helps illustrate the logistical "lifeline" that connected the remote, dusty trenches to the possibility of recovery and home. Whether Ray viewed this ship from the deck of the Dilwara or while stationed near a port, its presence in his collection documents the vital humanitarian side of the Korean campaign—a floating sanctuary amidst the turmoil of the "Forgotten War."

HMS Comus (D20) in Victoria Harbour

​This photograph captures a significant piece of naval history anchored in the busy waters of a Far Eastern port—almost certainly Hong Kong. The vessel at the centre of the frame is HMS Comus, a C-class destroyer that played a vital role in the early years of the Korean War.

​The visible pennant number, D20, confirms her identity. For a soldier in the Royal Norfolk Regiment, the sight of a Royal Navy destroyer was a reassuring symbol of British reach. Comus was a veteran of the conflict, famously surviving an air attack by North Korean aircraft in 1950. During Ray’s tour in 1951–52, she was a key part of the West Coast support group, providing naval gunfire and protecting the sea lanes that kept the army supplied.

  • ​The Setting: The backdrop of steep, developed hillsides indicates Victoria Harbour. Hong Kong served as the primary base for the British Pacific Fleet and was the most coveted destination for "Rest and Recuperation" (R&R). After the dusty, vertical warfare of the Korean interior, the sights and sounds of a bustling British colony like Hong Kong would have been a staggering contrast for any Norfolk lad.

  • ​The Scene: In the foreground, a small motor launch cuts through the water, illustrating the constant activity of the harbour. The Comus sits at anchor, her White Ensign flying, appearing both elegant and formidable against the hazy coastline.

This photograph captures a relaxed, personal moment on the journey home. Ray is pictured sitting on the deck of the MS Dilwara, stripped to the waist and enjoying the sea breeze.

​The ship’s name is clearly visible on the lifebelt behind him, serving as a definitive marker of this stage of his service. The Dilwara was a dedicated troopship that carried thousands of British soldiers to and from the Far East during the 1950s. After the intensity and physical hardship of the Korean hills, this image represents the transition back to civilian life—a moment of quiet reflection as the ship began its long voyage back towards the UK.

Ray Brooker in a sharp, formal standing pose, likely at a transit camp or rear-echelon base in Korea.

​He is dressed in the classic British "Jungle Green" tropical uniform, consisting of a short-sleeved bush jacket and shorts, complemented by thick woollen hose tops and puttees. His dark blue beret, featuring the Royal Norfolk Regiment cap badge, is worn with military precision.

​The background offers a glimpse into the structured environment of a semi-permanent military outpost, with telegraph poles, Nissen huts, and a expansive, dusty parade ground stretching toward the ever-present Korean mountains. This image perfectly illustrates the "smartness" maintained by National Service men even in a distant theatre of war, representing the disciplined side of the Norfolk Regiment’s presence in the Far East.

A candid look at the daily life of a National Service man during a warmer spell in the campaign.

​The soldier is pictured stripped to the waist, likely during a period of rest or while working in a rear-echelon area. He is wearing high-waisted olive drab shorts and woollen hose tops, with his field service cap (FS cap) worn at a jaunty angle.

​The backdrop reveals the typical environment of a British military camp in the Far East, with dusty, sun-baked ground and functional buildings nestled at the foot of the jagged mountains. This image highlights the contrast between the rigid discipline of formal parades and the practical, often sweltering reality of service life half a world away from Norfolk.

​A Birds-Eye View of the Campaign

​This image provides vital geographical context, showing the sheer size of the "tent cities" and barracks that housed thousands of UN troops.

  • ​Camp Architecture: The valley floor is dominated by rows of semi-permanent huts or large tents, arranged with typical military precision. To the right, the emerald-green patches of paddy fields provide a stark contrast to the dusty, tan-coloured earth of the camp, showing how the military footprint sat directly alongside the ancient agricultural landscape of the Korean people.

  • ​Logistics and Scale: Beyond the living quarters, you can see wide parade grounds or vehicle parks and a winding supply road snaking off into the distance. This was the reality of the war: for every man on a firing step in the trenches, there were several more in bases like this, managing the immense flow of supplies, ammunition, and reinforcements.

  • ​The Vantage Point: The foreground is dominated by weathered rocks and sparse, wind-swept pines, typical of the Korean ridgelines. This "lookout" perspective is one that would have been very familiar to a soldier in the Royal Norfolk Regiment, whose service was defined by holding high ground and observing the movements in the valleys below.


Gallery 3 of 6.


GO BACK TO PHOTO GALLERY 1

Royal Norfolk Regiment Tour of Korea and Hong Kong 1951/2. Gallery 2

GO TO KOREA ROYAL NORFOLK REGIMENT PHOTO GALLERY 1

Korean War Gallery 2 of 6. AI restoration and colourisation of b/w negative scans by Google Gemini. Royal Norfolk Regiment. 1951-1952 Korea and Hong Kong Tour. Although Ray had the negatives, and perhaps the camera, you can see him on many of these images.

Brothers in Arms

​This image highlights the "United Nations" nature of the conflict, as Ray is pictured here (second from rear right) with a group of soldiers from several different regiments. While the Royal Norfolks are well-represented, the variation in headgear and insignia tells a broader story of the British Brigade.

  • ​Regimental Diversity: Most notably, the soldier in the front left is wearing a Glengarry with the red-and-white dicing of a Scottish regiment, likely the King's Own Scottish Borderers (KOSB), who served alongside the Norfolks in the 28th and 29th Brigades.

  • ​Uniform Details: The men are in various states of "smartness." Some are wearing the classic 1937-pattern khaki battledress with starched collars and ties, while others, like the soldier in the centre with the white belt, appear to be dressed for a more formal parade or guard duty. Ray stands tall in the back row (third from left), looking every bit the seasoned National Service man.

  • ​The Formation: The camaraderie in this photo is palpable. In the context of a National Service tour, these friendships were often the only constant in an environment that was otherwise defined by movement and uncertainty. For a lad from East Anglia, serving alongside men from the Scottish Borders or other parts of the UK was often their first real exposure to the different cultures and accents within the British Isles.

Sun, Dust, and the NAAFI

​This image provides a vivid sense of the everyday environment in a forward camp. Ray stands second from the left, arms around his mates, looking remarkably fit and lean—a testament to the physical rigours of life in the Royal Norfolks.

​The NAAFI Sign: Just behind the group, a wooden crate or sign clearly marked "NAAFI" (Navy, Army and Air Force Institutes) is visible. For a National Service man, the NAAFI was the ultimate touchstone of home. It was where one could find a "proper" cup of tea, British chocolate, or a few cigarettes, providing a vital psychological break from the rations and the intensity of the front.

  • ​Identification: The soldier on the far left is wearing his "dog tags" (identity discs), a sobering reminder of the reality of their situation, even in a moment of relaxation.

  • ​The Kit: The men are wearing their high-waisted olive drab combat trousers and ammunition boots. Note the "blousing" of the trousers at the ankles, a practical measure to keep out the dust and insects of the Korean scrub.

  • ​Camp Life: In the background, the heavy canvas ridge tents and ammunition boxes suggest a semi-permanent encampment, perhaps a "rest and recuperation" area where the men could finally wash, shave, and escape the confined spaces of the trenches for a few days.

A Section of the Royal Norfolks

​This image is particularly useful as it showcases the formal uniform and rank structure within the battalion. Unlike the candid shots in the field, the men here are smartly turned out in their woollen battledress, providing a clear look at the regimental identity they carried with them.

  • Regimental Pride: Every man is wearing the dark blue beret adorned with the Britannia cap badge. You can also clearly see the red "Royal Norfolk" shoulder titles and the green and red divisional signs. The presence of several Sergeants and Corporals (identified by the stripes on their sleeves) suggests this was a cohesive unit, perhaps a specific platoon or section that had served together throughout the tour.

  • ​The "Lanyard" Detail: Note the coloured lanyards worn on the shoulders. These were often specific to certain companies or specialist roles within the regiment, adding another layer of intricate military tradition to their appearance.

  • ​National Service Faces: The striking thing about this photo is the youthfulness of the group. These were mostly men in their late teens or early twenties, fulfilling their two-year National Service obligation. This image acts as a portal to 1950s Britain, showing the faces of those who were plucked from everyday life in East Anglia and sent to a global flashpoint.

The Faces of the 1st Battalion

​This photograph captures the quiet confidence of a battle-hardened unit. By this stage of the campaign, these National Service men had transitioned from raw recruits in the UK to experienced soldiers operating in one of the most challenging environments on earth.

  • ​Regimental Insignia: This shot is excellent for showing the consistency of the battalion's appearance. The Britannia cap badges on the blue berets and the red-on-khaki Royal Norfolk shoulder titles are uniform across the group. On the far right, a Corporal’s three-stripe chevron is clearly visible, topped with the regimental title and the divisional flash—likely the 1st Commonwealth Division, which was formed in July 1951.

  • ​A Study in Character: Each face tells a story of the National Service era. From the soldier in the back left with his period-correct spectacles to the relaxed, smiling expressions of the men in the front row, it reflects the high morale often noted in the Norfolks' war diaries.

  • ​The Landscape: In the background, the sparse, scrubby vegetation and the hazy sky are typical of the Korean countryside outside of the monsoon season. The terrain looks dusty and unforgiving, a far cry from the lush greenery of the Norfolk Broads or the Wensum Valley.

Jungle Greens and Corrugated Iron

​This image highlights a different side of the overseas experience, away from the mud and heavy woollens of the front line. The men are wearing "Jungle Greens," which were standard issue for British troops in Far Eastern theatres.

  • ​The Uniform: The smart appearance of the bush jackets, belted at the waist, and the sharp creases in the shorts suggest a more permanent barracks or a transit camp. The soldiers are also wearing puttees (the leg wraps) with polished black boots, and their dark blue berets with the Britannia cap badge remain a constant mark of their regimental pride.

  • ​Architecture of Service: The background features a corrugated iron building, a ubiquitous sight in British military outposts across the world during the 1950s. These structures served as everything from mess halls to sleeping quarters, providing a stark contrast to the dugout shelters Ray would have inhabited in the hills.

  • ​The Atmosphere: The light and shadows suggest a bright, clear day, and the presence of a soldier in the distance walking along a concrete path indicates a structured, orderly military environment. This photo illustrates the "other half" of service life—the periods of drill, discipline, and relative comfort that punctuated the intense periods of combat.

The Face of the Regiment

​In this shot, the details of the Royal Norfolk Regiment uniform are exceptionally clear. You can see the variation in how the men wore their kit—some in the standard woollen battledress blouse, one in a more casual V-neck jumper, and another in shirt-sleeves—reflecting a moment of relaxation in a rear area or transit camp.

  • ​Regimental Identity: The dark blue berets and the Britannia cap badges are perfectly uniform, and the red "Royal Norfolk" shoulder titles are sharp and legible. These were the symbols that connected these young men back to their homes in East Anglia while they served in a vastly different world.

  • ​Rank and Responsibility: The inclusion of NCOs (Non-Commissioned Officers), identified by the white stripes (chevrons) on their sleeves, suggests this was a complete tactical unit. The mix of smiles and steady gazes captures the quiet resilience of National Service men who had navigated the complexities of the Korean campaign together.

​The Setting: The lush greenery in the background suggests this may have been taken during the spring or summer months. It offers a softer contrast to the harsh, rocky ridgelines seen in the frontline photos, perhaps representing a period of "Rest and Recuperation" before the next rotation or the journey home.

Gallery 2 of 6

GO NEXT TO KOREA ROYAL NORFOLK REGIMENT PHOTO GALLERY 3

GO BACK TO PHOTO GALLERY 1

Age of the Degeneracy - reconstructing the Late Mesolithic of Britain

Image Source - my own, taken today, of a flint blade from an old finds box. Thetford Forest. It would have been recorded as a snapped blade, possibly transitional Mesolithic-Neolithic. Now in the 21st Century I understand that this blade was strictly, Mesolithic. I no longer believe there was transition.

I've written a novel. The story provided me with an escape from unbearable life. The tale has two primary settings, both circa 6,000 years ago.  One in what is now South Iraq on the edge of the marshes where civilisation starts to take shape, and the other in South East Britain, as Mesolithic hunter-gatherers meet Neolithic farmers. It is a little play on parts of the Genesis story.

I was cut off from all Nature. I am only just now starting to reconnect. It will be a very long healing experience if I decide to maintain it. Because I'm running short of hope. I had very little access to data. I had to scrap around in order to attempt any understanding of how the Mesolithic British may have experienced life, and was left with little more than contemplation. This is how I reconstructed a fictional South-eastern British environment 6,000 years ago:

Natural Britain during the Early Holocene

Birch scrub advanced first. Followed by pine, yew, and other evergreens.  This is the Age of Star Carr. The tundra grasslands receded with this rapid advance. Temperatures increased annually. Waters began to rise.

The birch grew taller. Alder joined them. Willow and holly. Followed by oak. Lime and hazel arrived on the British peninsular of North West Europe. Wych elm, hawthorn, blackthorn then ash. In South Eastern Britain, it was the lime which dominated as the most common tree.

Tree biodiversity was actually quite limited in Late Mesolithic Britain. Because the North Sea (Doggerland), and the English Channel, flooded with thawed out glacial waters to make Britain an island, before more species could shift across any land-bridge.

Later Mesolithic SE Britain.  Wild-woods or temperate-forests?

I suspect that the term temperate rainforest should be reserved for the wetter parts of the British Isles. Particularly for the west. Across the drier south-east of Britain, I propose that it would be better to describe it as wildwood.  Even here I suspect that the ecology was incredibly rich, with mosses, lichen and fungi.  Some areas of the wildwoods were kept quite open by the actions of large wild bovines that generated their own woodland pastures. Others were more dense.

The British canopy was not continuous. Breaking it were small glades, and some larger plains. These were kept open by browsing and grazing herbivores that herded in the open - aurochs, red deer, bison, roe deer. A distinct ecology existed on these small scrubs and prairies. 

Equally there were lowland marshes and fens of reed bed with water-logged islands of alder carr. Often, belts of these ran up the riparian terraces of river valleys to provide rich habitats for birds, beavers, and pig. The rivers were clean, and ran naturally within their floodplains except for the works of beavers. Upper stretches of chalk streams would have been choked by Summer watercress. Alder and willow trees dominated the riparian belts. Banks were not cut, and rivers wider, bordered by the roots of alder, or by gravel shores. They often flowed around riverine islets and over gravel banks. Water channels changed their many courses through the marshes of deltas.

Bird-life was devoid of some species that have adapted to and follow human agriculture, but could have included some surprise species no longer in the British Isles such as black woodpecker, black stork, and European eagle owl. These in addition to species such as titmice, woodcock, wood pigeon, tawny owl, bustards, and cranes. Goshawks would have been a widespread raptor across the forests, and white tailed eagles not an uncommon site.

Mammalian predators included wolf, brown bear, lynx, fox, badgers and martens

Image Source - taken on the phone today.

I've demonstrated in recent posts that the Mesolithic hunter-foragers in Britain, most likely descended either from the Ice Age Epigravettians of Italy and South East Europe. They or / and perhaps recent arrivals from South West Asia, who had crossed a dry Aegean. A recent study of ancient genomes supported the former population.

We know that they appear from genetics to be dark skinned and possibly with light coloured eyes.  That is just a fine detail. To those people that make a deal out of it, I ask why? And I love the reconstructions of western hunter-gatherers by Tom Björklund.

What was the environment in South East Britain, 6,500 years ago? How had they adapted to the changed environment?  Their ancestors had survived the Ice age mammoth steppe. They had survived so long on the tundra.  What challenges had the Holocene's new forests thrown at them?   Their ungulate prey species had dispersed from herds in the open, and into the woods. There, they were more difficult to locate, and could quickly disappear into cover. They had less need to form large herds.  Temperate forests release a lot of their calories only during the autumn. To survive, Mesolithic hunter-foragers needed to be exceptionally intelligent. They needed to break up into smaller bands, and adapt to a forest way of life

How I portray Late Mesolithic Britons in fiction

The wild-woods may not have always been dense. Yet they would have been difficult for humans to traverse by foot. Deadwood would have laid across everywhere. Its rot fed the ecology. Moss and dead leaf-mould, deep. Some alder rain-forests would have been likely waterlogged and swamped. Walking across these environments uses a lot of calories that are otherwise precious.

It was probably easier to travel by waterway whenever possible. Although upper rivers might be seasonally clogged by growth, and beaver dams a trial. Watercraft include dugouts, but also canoes of bark or animal skin. It would have been the way to travel.

During this travelling, few people would have been encountered. The bands dispersed in order to make best use of resources. Human population was likely very sparse across Britain.

Image Source.  11,000-year-old skull headdress from Star Carr.

Food opportunities were seasonal:

Late Winter / Early Spring. Bands would have radiated out of winter encampments, hunting deer, pig, among other prey species. But these themselves were losing all winter fat. The Mesolithic people may have relied heavily on caches of roasted nuts and other preserves. Or chewed tree resin and inner bark to stave off hunger. Fish were available, through traps, nets, spears. Eel, chub, and pike. This may have been the lazy time, when they sat around hearths, preserving expensive energy.

Late Spring.  Wild greens, pignuts, tubers, flowers, cat-tails, buds, even young tree leaves of elm and hawthorn. Slow game - birds eggs and chicks. Possibly European pond turtles. Roots such as those of cat tail could be dried and ground into flour.

Summer.  I have my fictional hunter-foragers moving to the coast during summer, where they meet up with other bands for sports and social networking. There they could have foraged sea beet, sea lettuce, samphire, buckthorn berry, and shellfish. Mussels, oysters, clams, cockles, razor shells, whelks, crabs.  Perhaps hunted seals on the beaches and sea flats.  Cetaceans would have been vastly more abundant in the seas, and whales would beach, providing opportunities. Sea canoes might have provided the opportunity to fish with nets, or to hunt small cetaceans. Late summer inland, and wild berries - raspberry, mulberry, sloe, brambleberry, elderberry, buckthorn, hawthorn.  Early fungi such as puffballs, parasols, chicken-of-the-woods.

Autumn / Early Winter.  Busy squirrels and martens could be snared.  Game is now at its fattest.  The salmon run on more British rivers than today.  But this would also be a time for foraging nuts and seeds. The hazel-nut may have almost been a staple, at least as a preserve.  It would have been roasted. It can be ground into flour to make bread and biscuits. Acorns were also abundant. They could be rinsed and soaked to remove excessive tannins, then added to flours. Pine nuts if many of their trees remained in South East Britain. Wild grass seeds could be harvested.  Beech probably arrived with the Neolithic. I imagine the small camps being busy at this time of year, processing acorns and nuts to be cached as food reserves. Edible fungi including bollettes, ceps, chanterelles, deceivers, and many more will carpet the wildwoods.
Image Source. Aurochs in a wild wood.

The dark honeybee was most probably abundant in the lime tree forests. I’m sure that their hives in dead trees would have been exploited for honey and wax. The honey could be eaten, or used to make mead - perhaps adding some berries for yeast. Birch and tree sap could also be enjoyed, and fermented to make alcohol. Hallucinogenic mushrooms would have been exploited. The beeswax would also be added to tree resins to make their glues.

Favoured prey species for hunting would have been the red deer, also roe deer, wild boar, aurochs (enormous wild cattle), European bison if they remained, tarpan / wild horse, fox, badger, beaver, etc. Bird species on the menu probably included geese, ducks, cranes, swans, bustards, wood pigeons, turtle doves, woodcock, snipe, etc.  My savages had the domestic dog, but it is a laika-type, that does not bark. It is useful for tracking prey by scent. Dogs also provide companionship and warmth in a den.

The belief system that I designed for my fictional savages was animist. The sense of self, and of afterlife, is projected onto everything natural - prey, trees, tools, the forest, and otherwise. Areas of natural resources became sacred. My fictional savages had female shamans, and were matrilineal. Celebrations and feasts would be frequent. They would engage in sports.  I also suggested some ritual cannibalism, if only to prevent the ghosts of enemies from extracting revenge on the living. I portrayed them as very egalitarian, with little personal property, and no chieftains. But they had different roles for either gender, and the elders were respected.

My fictional savages have a totem-identity, but I'm not sure that would have been the case. Again, my choice was to tie them to local nations set into a larger territory called a wilderness. These nations I divided into smaller more practically sized family bands. None of this is based on any strong anthropological evidence, and was entirely my own creativity.  In reality, bands could have had a wider more homogeneous identity, and ranged wider across the British Isles, free of tribal territorial restrictions. Yet I see this as leading to conflict.

Birth rate in my savages was controlled by extended nursing and delayed weaning in comparison to the Neolithic farmers. This reduced fertility. Otherwise competition would grow for limited natural resources, and local prey extinctions. Conflict between bands would follow as an ultimate population control.

Have I romanticised my Mesolithic Britons? Absolutely I have. I am envious of their freedoms, their relationship with Nature. I see progress as degenerative. 


That is how I creatively wrote the British Late Mesolithic.

The Forgotten Origin of the British - Late Bronze Age


Image of an LBA socketed axehead from Portable Antiquities Scheme

The Forgotten Contribution to the South British Genome.

 A research team looking at ancientDNA led by David Reich had already detected a 97% population replacement across Britain at the close of the Neolithic period, circa 2,300 BCE. They proposed that the Earlier, European Neolithic Farmers of Britain, were replaced by a new people, associated with the Bell Beaker artefact culture. These new people had previously been admixed between European Neolithic Farmers living on the Continent, and recently migrants from the Pontic & Caspian Steppes of Eurasia. 

Northern Europe has more of this migrant Yamnaya / Steppe ancestry which arrived during the 3rd Millennium BCE, while Southern Europe (peaking in Sardinia, then Iberia) has more residual ancestry from the earlier, European Neolithic Farmers. Yet the South British (English) have rather more Neolithic ancestry than other Northern neighbours. This raised questions concerning where had this DNA come from.

Reich's team speculated on this result, and investigated the remains of ancient DNA further. This was later reported on:

Large-scale migration into Britain during the Middle to Late Bronze Age

https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/183814/2/Manuscript.pdf

In the above paper, the research team suggest a secondary migration event, that followed the Bell Beaker population replacement. They date it to the end of the Middle Bronze Age / start of the Late Bronze Age circa 900 BCE, although proposed that it had slowly been arriving for some time, before a surge of new arrivals to Britain. They do not pinpoint where these immigrants come from, but by their heavier Neolithic ancestry, it is proposed that they had moved up from further south, most probably from France. How many? The study proposes a 50% DNA replacement in Southern Britain, across England & Wales. I think that is probably comparable to the most recent, highest estimates for the much later Anglo-Danish immigration event.

The tabloids of course, reacted:

From this it has further been proposed, that it may have been this forgotten immigration which brought the p-celtic and / or q-celtic languages to Britain. If you subscribe to identifying Iron Age Britons as Insular Celts then this could represent the arrival in Britain. 

Personally I feel that what we 21st Century CE people believe to be Insular Celtic, reflects a much longer, older exchange of people and ideas across Britain, Ireland, and the Western Seaboard of Europe during the Bronze and Iron Ages. The Romans did much later, claim more recent Belgae migrations into Britain, some tribes even shared names with tribes in France and Belgium. These could represent a continuation of migration, possibly of elites. Prehistoric Britain was very much in contact with the nearby Continent, and a part of Europe.

Conclusion

Those socketed axe heads, and other artefacts of the Late Bronze Age may now be identified as representing a new culture and people, admixing into Southern Britain.

Through studies of ancient genomes, we are witnessing the reveal of a number of prehistoric migration events into Britain. These above, contribute to the modern British genome. Earlier migrations than these are also known. The Bell Beaker folk may have replaced to builders of Avebury, but those Neolithic Farmers had previously replaced the Mesolithic hunter-gatherers already here. Ancient DNA of Neolithic Britons is markedly different to that of any Mesolithic remains, and carries genetic markers from South West Asia.

Neither were the Mesolithic Britons aboriginal. The DNA of Cheddar Man (and others of his time from around Western Europe), originates from Arabia / Asia, and is different to any earlier so far sequenced. They were possibly not of the Magdalenian Culture. The story of the Europeans has often been a series of migrations from regions of Asia, both north and south of the Caucasus.

From this we should judge the Anglo-Danish (Anglo-Saxon plus later Danish arrivals) immigration, as being no more than one of several such events, with earlier examples until recently, lost in prehistory.

Original Nature publication:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04287-4

On BBC:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-59741723

Earlier Posts:

The Beaker phenomenon and genetic transformation of Northwest Norfolk. A layman's take 2017

https://paulbrooker.posthaven.com/the-beaker-phenomenon-and-genetic-transformation-of-northwest-europe-2017-a-laymans-take

Celebrating my Steppe and Beaker ancestors

https://paulbrooker.posthaven.com/celebrating-my-steppe-and-beaker-ancestors

Own Photo.

Notes for Mesolithic Western Europeans. The last free people of Europe.

Lola, Mesolithic girl on National Geographic

The above is a link to a reconstruction by Tom Björklund of a Mesolithic girl who lived in what is now Denmark. It is a very unique and creative reconstruction, because nothing physical of this girl nicknamed Lola survives into our archaeological record! She is only known by her DNA (and that of recently eaten food) that she left on a lump of birch tree pitch that she had chewed as a gum some 5,700 years ago. But I really like this reconstruction. I think that she makes a beautiful wild child. Straight out of the lines of a novel that I'm trying to write.

Analysis of her DNA strongly suggests brown toned skin, if not dark brown. Her hair dark brown. The DNA supports that her eyes were light coloured. Perhaps blue, blue-green or hazel? I'll return to Lola, but first these features correspond to those suggested by the genomes of other Mesolithic remains scattered around Europe.

Cheddar Man

Cheddar Man who lived in South West Britain around 10,000 years ago is the best known. The revelation several years ago that the DNA sequenced from his genome, suggests both dark skin and blue eyes caused quite a commotion. A lot of people didn't like it, and accused the geneticists of woke.

We always knew that the earliest modern humans were likely to have plenty of melanin. Subsisting on a hunter-gatherer diet that was rich in dietary Vitamin D meant that there was little adaptive pressure for them to lose this dark skin in a hurry. Just as some hunters in the far north and far south have retained dark skins into recent times. The emphasis to reduce melanin may not have arrived until following major shifts to a poor, agricultural diet in northern zones. The DNA associated with very light skin of modern Western Europeans may not have arrived until quite recently (prehistorically speaking).

We also had Villabruna Man in Northern Italy. His presence and DNA is less known to the general public. But even before the controversy of the Cheddar Man reconstruction, we knew from Villabruna and other remains that he lacked certain genetic indicators of light skin and:

Additional evidence of an early link between west and east comes from the HERC2 locus, where a derived allele that is the primary driver of light eye color in Europeans appears nearly simultaneously in specimens from Italy and the Caucasus ~14,000-13,000 years ago.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4943878/

But one recent study proposes that there were at least two distinct clusters of hunter-gatherers around Europe at the close of the last Ice Age:

On the basis of the genetic variation of present-day Europeans, this could imply phenotypic differences between post-14 ka hunter-gatherer populations across Europe, with individuals in the Oberkassel cluster possibly exhibiting darker skin and lighter eyes, and individuals in the Sidelkino cluster possibly lighter skin and darker eye colour.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05726-0

 I think that may be close to the truth, that there was most likely a variation in skin tones and eye colours across Europe during late prehistory.

Then we met 'Elba the Shepherdess' from Galicia, Spain. She dates to around 9,300 years ago. Analysis of Elba's ancient DNA suggests that she was dark-skinned and haired, and brown-eyed. Her remains had spectacularly been excavated along with three aurochs (wild cattle). Her relationship to these aurochs has raised extremely controversial questions about possible domestication. I do like the aurochs. I might make them the a subject of a later post.


Imagination


British Archaeology has long been going through a struggle where it tries to lose its roots within the Arts, and relocate itself within the (social) sciences. Clinging vigorously to data, they fear telling any stories (which is what hi-story does). In my own creative writing, I have my British hunter-gatherers at the close of the Mesolithic as shameless animists, who see themselves very much as a part of Nature. Mine are trapped into nations or tribes, divided into semi-nomadic bands who wander a larger region that I call a wilderness. In the background (but no longer in the novel) from their own golden age, they look back through folklore to an earlier time when they were more free, to wander further, one nation, following herds of steppe and forest bison.

In their own contemporary wilds 6000 years ago, I have them hunting red deer, roe deer, wild pig, aurochs (wild cattle), red squirrel, martens, seal, porpoise, whales, beaver, fox, waterfowl (ducks/geese), bustards, cranes, wood pigeon, woodcock, fishing/trapping eel, salmon, trout, chub, pike. Foraging for hazelnut, acorns (which they need to process to reduce tannin), cat-tails, wild garlic, pig-nuts, harvesting wild grass seeds, tubers, roots, tree sap, flower buds, lichens, sea lettuce, samphire, berries (blackberry, raspberry, elderberry, hawthorn), black bee honeycomb (yes they make berry mead and alcoholic birch sap), greens (including some springtime tree leaves), tree inner bark (in desperation or to chew), fungi (bollettes, blewitts, ceps, chanterelle, puffballs, chicken-of-the-woods and many more), mussels, sea molluscs /shellfish, crustaceans. I did also include beechnuts, but then found that the beech may have only just arrived with the Neolithic. Ugh! 

One thing that this creative writing has helped me understand about the British Late Mesolithic, is that the forests at that time lacked a wealth of biodiversity. Britain had parted from the European Continent too soon following the glaciers - Ireland more so. Few tree species had made it here. The temperate wild-woods (I don't think all of those in the south-east could have been classed as rain-forests) could be very mean with any calories between early winter and mid spring. I emphasise that in the story, the need to gather in late summer and through the autumn, and to process and store what they could. Acorns and hazel nuts could be roasted and even ground into a flour to make breads.  Wild grass seeds may have been added. The game would have been fatter at that time of year, and the salmon would run. Oh, I dare to suggest that my hunter-foragers are also gardeners of their wilds, encouraging hazel and birch to spread and survive.

Late winter may have been comparatively miserable, where the bands would laze close to hearths. Conserving valuable calories of their energy.

I enjoy imagining the wild-woods of SE Britain 4000 BCE. Perhaps not all temperate rain-forest, but neither anything like a modern day woods. Deadwood, flooding, saplings, rot, deep ferns and mosses. They would have been difficult to pass through by foot. Waterway would have been preferred. Trees with mosses and octopus boughs. Lime (linden) trees, elm, wych elm, oak, birch, alder, willow, ash, pine.  Wolves, lynx, brown bear. Eagles, black woodpeckers, and goshawks. But I don't imagine it all as wild-wood. I have opted in my imagined Britain 4000 BCE, for lots of small glades, and larger open plains that in the story, I call prairies. Here herds of aurochs join those of red and roe deer, to keep this scrub and grassland opened up. Bustards parade by orchids, while the cuckoo calls.

But all in my imagination. Not fact.



Returning to Lola in Denmark. The gum also revealed that she was lactose intolerant, and this has also been found in other genetic remains of this period. The DNA of hazel and mallard duck was also on the gum, and it is thought that hazelnut and duck may have been her recent meals. I think it is incredible archaeology that a lump of birch pitch could produce such a result. The 5,700 ybp was based on radio carbon dating of the lump of Mesolithic chewing gum.

When I was a voluntary archaeologist and field walker, I would treasure any microliths, microlith waste cores (I had a few), and a tranchet axe head (below) that I found from the Mesolithic. It was always my favourite period of prehistory. When people would have related to other species as a part of the Natural World to which they belonged. Innate animism that I strongly relate to as an autistic biophilliac. Or did they? Next post I will look at Gobekli Tepe and other sites of this same period across Anatolia. Have we simplified the savage?


So for all of their imperfections and inaccuracies, here are the faces of the Mesolithic. The last truly free wild people of European Nature. The last savages of Europe. Before we started to screw it all up.  Lola is my favourite.

The Sleeve Tattoo - first phase.

My latest tattoo.  Black and grey realism work by Ross Lee of Ink Addiction tattoo studio in Norwich.  This is the first phase of a full sleeve project on my right arm and shoulder.  Hopefully complete by Summer 2019. If you can't see it - then you're not a NW European prehistorian.  It's a British landscape scene, with boulder rocks in the foreground.  On those rocks are a series of carvings pecked into rock, during the Later Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Age.  They consist of a class of Rock Art markings known as cups and rings, or cup and ring markings.

No-one really knows what they symbolised.  I can't think of a more worthy tattoo for a time traveller.

My right arm will eventually be covered with a series of panels displaying cup and ring marks in British landscapes.